首页> 外文OA文献 >Scaling-up the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in India: An economic analysis
【2h】

Scaling-up the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in India: An economic analysis

机译:扩大印度Xpert MTB / RIF检测方法以检测结核病和利福平的耐药性:经济分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

India is considering the scale-up of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for detection of tuberculosis (TB) and rifampicin resistance. We conducted an economic analysis to estimate the costs of different strategies of Xpert implementation in India. Using a decision analytical model, we compared four diagnostic strategies for TB patients: (i) sputum smear microscopy (SSM) only; (ii) Xpert as a replacement for the rapid diagnostic test currently used for SSM-positive patients at risk of drug resistance (i.e. line probe assay (LPA)); (iii) Upfront Xpert testing for patients at risk of drug resistance; and (iv) Xpert as a replacement for SSM for all patients. The total costs associated with diagnosis for 100,000 presumptive TB cases were: (i) US$ 619,042 for SSM-only; (ii) US$ 575,377 in the LPA replacement scenario; (iii) US$ 720,523 in the SSM replacement scenario; and (iv) US$ 1,639,643 in the Xpert-for-all scenario. Total cohort costs, including treatment costs, increased by 46% from the SSM-only to the Xpert-for-all strategy, largely due to the costs associated with second-line treatment of a higher number of rifampicin-resistant patients due to increased drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) case detection. The diagnostic costs for an estimated 7.64 million presumptive TB patients would comprise (i) 19%, (ii) 17%, (iii) 22% and (iv) 50% of the annual TB control budget. Mean total costs, expressed per DR-TB case initiated on treatment, were lowest in the Xpert-for-all scenario (US$ 11,099). The Xpert-for-all strategy would result in the greatest increase of TB and DR-TB case detection, but would also have the highest associated costs. The strategy of using Xpert only for patients at risk for DR-TB would be more affordable, but would miss DR-TB cases and the cost per true DR-TB case detected would be higher compared to the Xpert-for-all strategy. As such expanded Xpert strategy would require significant increased TB control budget to ensure that increased case detection is followed by appropriate care
机译:印度正在考虑扩大Xpert MTB / RIF分析的检测范围,以检测结核病(TB)和利福平耐药性。我们进行了经济分析,以估算Xpert在印度实施不同策略的成本。使用决策分析模型,我们比较了结核病患者的四种诊断策略:(i)仅痰涂片镜检(SSM); (ii)Xpert替代了目前用于有耐药性的SSM阳性患者的快速诊断测试(即线探针测定法(LPA)); (iii)对有耐药风险的患者进行前期Xpert测试; (iv)Xpert替代所有患者的SSM。与100,000例结核病诊断相关的总费用为:(i)仅SSM费用为619,042美元; (ii)在LPA替换方案中为575,377美元; (三)替换小规模特别活动的费用为720,523美元; (iv)Xpert-for-all方案的费用为1,639,643美元。从仅SSM到全民治疗策略,包括治疗费用在内的总队列成本增加了46%,这主要是由于药物增加导致与二线治疗更多的耐利福平患者产生的相关费用耐药结核病(DR-TB)病例检测。估计有764万名假定结核病患者的诊断费用将占年度结核病控制预算的(i)19%,(ii)17%,(iii)22%和(iv)50%。在所有人均接受Xpert治疗的情况下,按治疗开始的DR-TB病例表示的平均总费用最低(11,099美元)。 Xpert-for-all战略将导致最大的结核病和DR-TB病例检测增加,但也将带来最高的相关成本。仅针对有DR-TB风险的患者使用Xpert的策略会更经济实惠,但会错过DR-TB病例,与每个Xpert-for-all策略相比,每检测到一个真正的DR-TB病例的成本会更高。由于这种扩展的Xpert策略将需要大量增加的结核病控制预算,以确保增加病例发现后进行适当护理

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号